An epiphany about political involvement – money has to get out of politics

I’ve had two epiphanies about politics in the last week. First, politics is too time consuming. Shocking I know. Second, politics is too money consuming. Neither of which I have much to spare, and like many people, I’m beginning to question whether my personal commitment is too great for the amount of satisfaction I receive in return.

This Thursday, I am hosting a fundraiser for Mike Obermueller at my home. When all is said and done, my mom (who graciously offered to help) and I will have spent over $200 on food and drinks. But it isn’t just the cost of food to have a get-together, it’s the little expenses to fix and clean the house that adds up too. Now you have to realize that we never have people over to our house. It is small, poorly laid out (a family birthday party is uncomfortably tight,) the cement and blacktop need serious work (I hope nobody trips and sues us,) we have a dog, two cats, and three smelly boys that quickly turn furniture into pieces homeless teen shelters wouldn’t accept, and don’t get me started on the carpet.

Needless to say, it is uncomfortable for us to have guests over. But when we do, we feel the need to fix all those little things we tend to procrastinate on fixing. Getting a new toilet seat to replace the cracked one. Our dining room chairs need new fabric on the seats since we got a new table. The valance above the patio door needs to be fixed or replaced, and that lacrosse ball hole in the wall should probably be fixed. It costs a fair amount of money to host a fundraiser from that standpoint, for things a majority of people wouldn’t even notice or care about if they did notice. By the way we are not spending the $12,000 to fix the driveway. I just hope the air conditioner survives the week…

When you combine our little foray into the world of fundraising with our desire to support our local candidates who bravely put themselves out there to run for office, we are spending a fair amount of money that should be going into our boy’s college funds, well, probably my vacation fund is more realistic…

The cost of being involved in politics is draining. I think it makes people who might like to be involved in political activities uncomfortable. There are pressures to donate. Each candidate running for state office needs to raise a minimum amount of cash to receive the state campaign funds. For House candidates, it is $1,500 and for Senate candidates it is $3,000 by July 23. What makes it challenging is that no amount in contributions over $50 from any individual counts toward that goal. So candidates who start late have to push to raise the right amount of cash in the right increments. And the activists are the first people asked. Not only are they asked, but they are practically guilted into it. Trust me I know, I begged people to donate this year to our candidates in DFL58. And once they donate, they are on the donation lists and begin getting regular calls from the DFL and the DCCC asking for money.

Some people say they don’t donate cash, but they donate their time. I do that, and it is just as draining, maybe more. I probably spend as much time as anybody in our district, outside of Jeanne and Charlie Thomas, working on DFL projects. But that time is time I should be spending doing other things probably. I am pretty good about going to my children’s events, but I want to finish some things to advance my career, I hardly ever write, I seldom play golf, I need to lose more than a few pounds, and all the junk I do for the DFL is taking away from some serious television and movie watching! In my case, I think that not only am I spending money on politics, I’m losing money by not concentrating on things to make more money. I’m not doing things I would enjoy much more, and although I would not enjoy it, let’s face it, a little more exercise would do me good.

My wife and I spent last night talking about what we do and whether what we do is worth it. This morning at a Bible study I attend (Monday mornings, 6:30 AM at Caribou on 185th in Lakeville. Feel free to join us, it is casual, friendly, Lutheran led, but not Lutheran specific, and we have a couple of open seats at the table.) my father-in-law said he just finished a book that asks the question of organizations why are you an organization. The question on the giant chalk board at Caribou today was something to the effect of “if you had a personal guiding principle what would it be?”

I’m trying to answer those questions and I think a lot of people are asking those questions about politics. Is being involved in politics worth it? Why are we involved in politics? If we had a personal motto, would anything vaguely political be part of it? People look at politics very cynically right now. How much money will be raised to win a local house race? Probably $25,000, most of it spent on advertisements mailed to homes that are more often than not thrown away without being read. And what do they get in return? $40,000 and a load of headaches. What about the Senate Race? Amy Klobuchar has $5,000,000 raised so far. In 2008 Barack Obama spent $730,000,000, what’s it going to be this year? A billion?

So even people who want to be involved are asking themselves “What’s the point?” Is it worth it? What do I get out of it? Small factions of people control politics and it’s distressing. There is nothing more disturbing to me than the partisanship shown by politicians towards constituents on the other side of the political spectrum. But I can’t do anything about it because if I were to help elect a DFLer, in most instances, the same thing would happen, just in the other direction.

When money is out of politics, or maybe I should say IF money is ever taken out of politics and people are truly elected on their own merits and on their beliefs, then people who shun politics might come back. But when we are rigging systems with hoops to jump through to vote with things like advanced registration and voter ID, or the Supreme Court telling Montana that all those years that Montana tried to keep money from influencing politics, Montana was wrong, or when we learn that a majority of the time members of the House serve in Washington is spent fundraising or at least rubbing elbows to open doors for fundraising for the next election, we decide it isn’t worth it. It’s not worth the time, energy, cash or frustration, when the 5 hours or the $200 can be used for something that significantly affects your own life. That’s what even hardcore activists are becoming. The base is smaller and smaller, and the crazies are becoming more prevalent. The normal person is stepping to the side and deciding to forget about it. It’s not about a belief anymore, it’s about sides. I’m happy when my team wins and pissed when my team loses. And politics is returning to the smoke filled rooms of yesterday, only the rooms aren’t smoke filled anymore from cigars and cigarettes, they are smoke filled because of the screen those people are trying to hide behind.

Politics needs to change; I just don’t see that it will happen. I’d make the analogy that it’s like a marriage, and the divorce papers are being prepared, but I know a family that broke up because of commitments to politics, and it just wouldn’t be right.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “An epiphany about political involvement – money has to get out of politics”

  1. Steve, another good post … prompting a catharsis moment … one of those posts that after you read it, you re-read it … and think about it.

    So, on Thursday, you and your family will host an Obermueller fundraiser … I’m guessing the suggested donation is $25 and hoping to get $250 …. Conversely across the pond, Mitt Romney has two fundraisers scheduled in London … one that was to be hosted by Bob Diamond of Barclay’s and LIBOR fame who now, after the scandal has taken his name off the invitation but the suggest donation of $75,000 is still there … btw after London, Romney heads on to Israel where for another fundraiser with a suggested donation of $60,000 … (I’m guessing that the American taxpayers are picking up the security costs for the presumptive nominee.)

    No doubt Romney will feel comfortable with the crowd and facility … and that is who he will represent if elected.

    Conversely, I suspect that Mike Obermueller is not coming to check out how the boys’ lacrosse skills have improved, but instead to “hear” the views and concerns of the people he wants to represent.
    Yeah, it’s a pain … a pain for you and your family, but the benefits are enormous. Our country has a lot of issues — the biggest is the divide between the “haves” and the “have-nots” … and here we are not talking about economic status but instead access. Because of people like you and your family, you home will be open for others to talk one-on-one with a candidate … getting real … discussing real issues.

    YES … Small factions of people control politics and it’s distressing. There is nothing more disturbing to me than the partisanship shown by politicians towards constituents … but there are some glimmers of hope.
    I’m down here in the First … I remember Tim Walz holding these type of neighborhood fundraisers when he ran in 2006 (I got invited but since I am not a member of any political party and wanted to maintain my independence, I did not attend) … I have seen Congressman Walz around town … with his kids … he’s always approachable … and if you review his work, you find out that the issues that he promoted then are consistent with his votes — heck, last week, he was able to get a change in FY13 Department of Defense Appropriations bill regarding combat-related eye trauma. I do not always agree with Congressman Walz’s votes, but he is open to his constituents’ views.
    Somehow, I suspect that Congresswoman Betty McCollum is the say way … the problem is that there are not enough Walz-McCollum types but instead too many that work to appease their Party Managers and entrenched interests.

    No doubt, your readers are familiar with President Eisenhower’s address and the concern of the expanding “military-industrial” Congressional alliances … yet last week, while Tim Walz is fighting to get healthcare funding for our military, John Kline is bemoaning that budget cuts could devastate the economy by throwing thousands of defense contractors out of work. However, as one Republican Congressman admitted, (1) Contrary to GOP claims, military spending is HIGHER under President Obama than it was under President Bush. (2) If the sequester is “devastating,” then so was President Bush’s military budget.
    The underlying bill spends about $1 billion more on the Department of Defense’s base budget than the current spending level.
    Yet, when it came to time to vote on a number of amendments … relatively small in comparison to the size of the problem, John Kline voted against cutting military bands and NASCAR advertising, a proposal to eliminate the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund, saving $375 million.– continuing to rebuild Afghanistan’s infrastructure while its government is not an unwavering ally—and while our own country’s infrastructure needs funding—is a poor use of taxpayer money … or even, an across-the-board cut to the underlying bill of $181 million (out of more than $600 BILLION).

    Kline is not part of the solution but he is definitely part of the problem.
    Mike Obermueller can be part of the solution … and he needs the Quist family and everyone else’s support … don’t give up the faith …

    BTW … speaking of “Quist” and “faith”, has Mike considering using a Minnesota-based operation for his campaign commercials ? If so, he may want to consider Bethany-Lutheran College and it’s Stone Path Studios … they have a number of graduates that have moved onto ESPN and the Minnesota Twins broadcasting operations … and now have produced their first political commercial paid for the Allen Quist campaign …. Cost may be very reasonable … the Quist FEC report lists a $4,000 payment on June 14 for production work.

  2. Allow me to thank Chairman Quist for opening his home to those folks in his area that wish to meet personally with candidate Obermueller. Having attended a similar meet and greet in the Shakopee are already, I only hope that some younger folks attend in Farmington. I opened my home a couple of decades ago to Congressmen. I had the honor of taking Bill Frenzel to visit a dairy farm – he had never been to one before. (Speaking of dairy, I still remember at a county fair when then plaid shirted Rudy Boschwitz grabbed the electrified stall guides when he was going to milk his first cow and the shocking delay he encountered.) These candidates, no matter what party, are mostly people with similar hopes and dreams. And it is regular folks like you, Chairman Quist, that through your time and treasure build upon those who have sacrificed to help keep the liberty we enjoy today. My dad ran for the Iowa legislature in 1936 and lost by 13 votes; he did not tell me until after in 1978 I had been endorsed to run for the Minnesota legislature – which I won by 41 votes after the recount. It was persons like you, Chairman Quist, that made it possible for me to serve as an elected representative for Lakeville and other areas.
    Hope to see you on Thursday.

Comments are closed.